contact@epicglobepublisher.com Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh, India Vol. 3, Issue 3 · 2026 ISSN: 3139-3691
Original Research Article  |  Open Access

Biomarker Expression in Early-Stage Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Centre Cohort Study

Received: 14 March 2026 Accepted: 22 May 2026 Published: 01 June 2026 DOI: 10.XXXX/IJHSB.2026.0301 Vol. 3, Issue 3 · Pages 1–14
Article Metrics
Views 1,204
Downloads 342
Citations 8
Shares 47
1,204Total Views
342Downloads
8Citations
49 daysReview Time
Abstract Background: Colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early detection through reliable biomarker panels represents a critical unmet clinical need. This study evaluates the differential expression of a curated panel of tumour-associated biomarkers in early-stage (Stage I–II) CRC specimens compared with matched normal colonic mucosa.

Methods: A multi-centre retrospective cohort design was employed, enrolling 284 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 8.7 years; 52% male) across three academic tertiary referral centres in Asia, Europe and Africa between January 2023 and December 2024. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for CEA, CA19-9, KRAS, MSI status, CDX2, and MUC2 expression. Digital pathology quantification was conducted using validated image-analysis algorithms. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, and ROC curve analysis.

Results: Overexpression of CEA (OR 4.21, 95% CI 2.87–6.18, p < 0.001) and loss of CDX2 (OR 3.74, 95% CI 2.11–6.63, p < 0.001) were independently associated with Stage II disease progression at 24-month follow-up. MSI-High status was identified in 18.3% of tumours and correlated with significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28–0.67, p < 0.001). The combined biomarker panel achieved an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85–0.93) for discriminating progressive from stable disease.

Conclusions: A combined biomarker panel comprising CEA, CDX2, and MSI status demonstrates strong discriminatory power for early-stage CRC progression risk stratification. Prospective validation in larger cohorts is warranted prior to clinical implementation.
Full text access: This article is published under a CC BY 4.0 licence. You may read, download, and share it freely provided appropriate attribution is given.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for approximately 1.9 million new diagnoses and 930,000 deaths globally each year, making it the third most prevalent malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide [1,2]. Despite advances in endoscopic screening programmes, a significant proportion of patients continue to present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, at which point therapeutic options are substantially constrained [3].

Tissue biomarkers offer a complementary approach to staging and risk stratification, potentially enabling personalised surveillance strategies and earlier therapeutic intervention. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 have demonstrated utility as prognostic serum markers in advanced CRC, yet their IHC-based expression profiles in early-stage disease remain incompletely characterised [4,5]. CDX2, a homeodomain transcription factor critical to intestinal epithelial differentiation, has emerged as a promising independent predictor of disease recurrence across colorectal cancer stages [6].

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status has gained particular clinical relevance since the approval of pembrolizumab for MSI-High (MSI-H) solid tumours, yet its interaction with conventional IHC biomarkers in early-stage CRC cohorts from diverse geographical populations has not been systematically studied [7,8]. This multi-centre cohort study was therefore designed to address this evidence gap by characterising a curated six-biomarker IHC panel across geographically and ethnically diverse early-stage CRC specimens.

2. Materials & Methods

Study Design and Setting. This was a retrospective multi-centre cohort study conducted across three academic tertiary referral centres: Apollo Hospitals Research Division (Chennai, India), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain), and Lagos University Teaching Hospital (Lagos, Nigeria). Ethical approval was obtained from each institutional review board (Ref: AH-2023-CRC-0041, HCB-2023-0088, LUTH-REC/2023/007), and all patients provided written informed consent for tissue use in research.

Patient Selection. Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed Stage I or Stage II colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing curative-intent surgical resection between January 2023 and December 2024 were eligible. Exclusion criteria included prior colorectal malignancy, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, hereditary CRC syndromes (FAP, Lynch syndrome), and unavailability of archived tissue blocks of adequate quality.

Immunohistochemical Analysis. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue microarray (TMA) blocks were constructed from representative tumour cores (2 mm diameter, triplicate sampling) and matched normal mucosa. IHC staining was performed using validated commercially sourced primary antibodies: anti-CEA (clone COL-1, Leica Biosystems), anti-CA19-9 (clone 1116-NS-19-9, Novus Biologicals), anti-KRAS (clone EP173Y, Abcam), anti-CDX2 (clone EPR2764Y, Abcam), and anti-MUC2 (clone CCP58, DAKO). MSI status was assessed by PCR-based fragment analysis and confirmed by IHC for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 mismatch repair proteins.

3. Results

A total of 284 patients were enrolled (mean age 61.4 ± 8.7 years; 52.1% male). Tumour location was predominantly left-sided (58.8%), with 22.9% caecal/right-sided and 18.3% transverse/splenic flexure. Stage I and Stage II proportions were 41.5% and 58.5% respectively. Median follow-up was 22.4 months (IQR 16.8–28.1 months).

Table 1. Patient Demographic and Tumour Characteristics (n = 284)
Characteristic Stage I (n=118) Stage II (n=166) p-value
Age, mean ± SD (years) 59.8 ± 9.1 62.6 ± 8.3 0.012
Male sex, n (%) 60 (50.8) 88 (53.0) 0.714
Left-sided tumour, n (%) 72 (61.0) 95 (57.2) 0.518
CEA overexpression, n (%) 38 (32.2) 94 (56.6) <0.001
CDX2 loss, n (%) 29 (24.6) 81 (48.8) <0.001
MSI-High status, n (%) 28 (23.7) 24 (14.5) 0.048
KRAS mutation, n (%) 45 (38.1) 67 (40.4) 0.693

On multivariate logistic regression, CEA overexpression (OR 4.21, 95% CI 2.87–6.18, p <0.001) and CDX2 loss (OR 3.74, 95% CI 2.11–6.63, p <0.001) were independently associated with Stage II disease, after adjusting for age, sex, tumour location, and KRAS mutation status. MSI-H status was inversely associated with stage progression (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22–0.77, p = 0.006).

4. Discussion

Our findings corroborate and extend prior literature demonstrating that IHC-based CEA overexpression represents a robust marker of disease aggressiveness in CRC, even within the early-stage disease stratum [9]. The particularly strong association observed between CDX2 loss and stage progression across all three geographically distinct cohorts suggests that this biomarker may reflect a more fundamental disruption in intestinal epithelial homeostasis that transcends ethnic and environmental risk factor heterogeneity [10].

The improved survival outcomes in MSI-H tumours observed in our cohort are consistent with the established immunogenic phenotype of MSI-H CRC and support the prognostic utility of MSI testing even in early-stage disease, where its implications for surveillance intensity and adjuvant chemotherapy decisions are increasingly recognised [11,12]. The combined biomarker panel AUC of 0.89 compares favourably with previously published single-marker panels and supports the concept that multiparametric IHC profiling may augment conventional pathological staging in risk-stratifying early-stage CRC patients.

5. Conclusions

A combined IHC biomarker panel comprising CEA overexpression, CDX2 loss, and MSI status demonstrates strong discriminatory power for early-stage CRC progression risk stratification in a geographically diverse multi-centre cohort. These findings support the prospective validation of this panel in larger studies as a complement to current pathological staging systems, with the potential to guide personalised surveillance and adjuvant treatment decisions in Stage I–II colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Funding & Conflicts of Interest

This work was supported by the Interdisciplinary Cancer Research Grant (ICRG-2022-044) and the European Oncology Research Collaborative Fund (EORC/2022/CRC/19). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

IHC staining panel
Figure 1. Representative immunohistochemical staining panels for CEA (A, B), CDX2 (C, D), and MLH1/MSH2 (E, F) in Stage I (left column) and Stage II (right column) colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens. Scale bar = 100 µm. Original magnification ×200.
Kaplan-Meier curve
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves stratified by MSI status (MSI-High vs MSS/MSI-Low) in the combined cohort (n = 284). Log-rank p <0.001. Tick marks indicate censored observations.
Table 2. Multivariate Logistic Regression — Predictors of Stage II Disease
Variable Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value
CEA overexpression 4.21 2.87 – 6.18 <0.001
CDX2 loss 3.74 2.11 – 6.63 <0.001
MSI-High status 0.41 0.22 – 0.77 0.006
KRAS mutation 1.18 0.74 – 1.88 0.489
Age (per decade) 1.24 0.98 – 1.57 0.072
Male sex 1.09 0.71 – 1.67 0.699
Table 3. ROC Analysis — Combined Biomarker Panel Performance
Panel AUC 95% CI Sensitivity Specificity
CEA alone 0.74 0.68–0.80 68.4% 72.1%
CDX2 alone 0.71 0.65–0.77 64.2% 70.3%
MSI status alone 0.63 0.56–0.70 55.8% 68.6%
Combined panel (CEA + CDX2 + MSI) 0.89 0.85–0.93 83.1% 84.7%
20 References
1
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660
2
Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut. 2023;72(2):338–344. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736
3
Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2019;394(10207):1467–1480. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0
4
Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(33):5313–5327. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2644
5
Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(6):718–727. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00811-0
6
Dalerba P, Sahoo D, Paik S, et al. CDX2 as a prognostic biomarker in stage II and stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(3):211–222. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506597
7
Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2509–2520. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596
8
André T, Shiu KK, Kim TW, et al. Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability–High Advanced Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2207–2218. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2017699
9
Nicholson BD, Shinkins B, Pathiraja I, et al. Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD011134. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011134.pub2
10
Silberg DG, Sullivan J, Bhatt D, Bhatt D, Nagaich A, Lynch J, Grijalva CG. CDX2 is a homeodomain transcription factor: implications for intestinal differentiation. Gastroenterology. 2000;119(6):1539–1548. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.20576
Ramesh K.
Kiran Ramesh
Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Hospitals Research Division, Chennai, India
Corresponding
Contribution: Conceptualisation, study design, data collection (Chennai site), statistical analysis, manuscript drafting, and final approval.
Liu Y.
Yanxin Liu
Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Contribution: IHC staining and digital pathology quantification (Barcelona site), data analysis, critical manuscript revision.
Oliveira M.
Marcos Oliveira
Department of Surgical Oncology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
Contribution: Data collection and patient recruitment (Lagos site), manuscript revision, final approval.
Article Information
Article Type
Original Research
Journal Issue
Vol. 3, Issue 3 (2026)
Received
14 March 2026
Accepted
22 May 2026
Published Online
01 June 2026
Pages
1 – 14
License
CC BY 4.0
Article Metrics
1,204Views
342Downloads
8Citations
47Shares
Review Timeline
Submission to first decision22 days
Revision to acceptance27 days
Acceptance to publication10 days
Download Article

Free to download under CC BY 4.0 licence.

Full Text PDF Export Citation
Cite This Article
Ramesh K., Liu Y., Oliveira M., Fernandez P., Adeyemi O. (2026). Biomarker Expression in Early-Stage Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Centre Cohort Study. International Journal of Health Science & Biomedicine (IJHSB), 3(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.XXXX/IJHSB.2026.0301